LIBERIA:
The Dynamics Of A Transforming Society
By Francis
W. Nyepon
The
vision to significantly transform the Liberian
society must first deal with changing behavior,
attitude and mindset of people at the bottom
of the social strata. Change can never come
to Liberia with the majority of its people believing
that public officials do not have their best
interest at heart as a collective; or the majority
of the people being stuck at the bottom of the
socioeconomic ladder. The lack of adequate healthcare,
difficulties accessing education, employment,
social marginalization, inadequate sanitation,
unsafe drinking water, indecent hygiene practice,
and treated garbage means that many Liberians
are dying unnecessarily or living in destitution.
The
real problem with injecting change in Liberia
is the lack of new ideas and boldness amongst
government functionaries, the press and civil
society groups to inspire and stimulate change
in behavior, attitude and mindset amongst the
majority of our people. Significant Social Transforming
must first and foremost remove social rejection
as a daily reality for the majority of our people.
Secondly, improvements in sanitation, water,
hygiene, health, education and livelihood must
not remain stalled. Thirdly, it is immoral to
continuously subjecting ordinary Liberians unnecessarily
to conditions of abject poverty given the enormous
amount of mineral resources and wealth our country
is endowed with.
Our
society cannot and will not change unless and
until we ourselves fundamentally change. By
change, the author refers here to social makeover,
improved livelihood and provision of basic services
to improve standard of living. The idea here
is that if in fact Liberian leaders desire real
change, then the livelihood of those living
at the bottom of the social strata must fundamentally
and strategically be improved. In other words,
the conscience of our people must be appealed
to in order for real transformation to occur.
Our society needs to be injected with appropriate
new thinking with bold new policy formulation
to basically root change in the people from
the bottom up. This author does not see Change
necessarily as building fancy hospitals and
school when there are no sufficient personnel
to run them properly or set the roadmap for
restructuring the social order within which
them mus operate.
In
order for Liberia to fundamentally change and
go through this kind of significant transformation
that the author is pointing towards, the government
must first engage in some fundamental restructuring
of its own and lead the charge. The government
must strategically and methodically take the
lead in lifting people out of poverty, misery
and hopelessness. Those whose whole focus is
based upon using the government as a spring
board to acquire personal wealth must immediately
be castigated and internally exiled, and the
government must became the escort in a massive
campaign to castigate such individuals by confiscating
ill-gotten property and wealth. If this isnt
done and we are not careful, disenchantment
could undermine the huge support base that President
Sirleaf has vigorously championed over the past
three years. Liberia cannot and will not and
must never again allow itself to be seen as
a war-ravaged country ruled by thugs, or governed
by authoritarian or autocratic leaders.
This
author is of the firm belief that if nothing
is done to fundamentally change Liberians from
the bottom up, then the country could be faced
with the reality of hope being turned into despair.
In other words, if we are not careful, our post-war
hopes and aspirations could be turned into despondency,
with corrupt, incompetent and divisive individuals
claiming the higher ground once again as they
successfully did for over 20 years. The creeping
in of a democratic framework of governance,
and rearranging the socio-economic order after
decades of burdens under debased tyrannies and
autocracies must not be silenced. If nothing
else, transparency, accountability, respect
for the rule of law, decentralized democratic
practices should be our guiding policy if stability
and growth are to be sustained and sincerely
rooted in the social order of the day.
The
new political dispensation, which elected Ellen
Johnson Sirleaf as President, was intended to
change and evolve into a democratically driven
society where the personification of integrity,
honesty and a deep sense of purpose and nationalism
would be achieved. But what went wrong with
the excitement and enthusiasm with which Liberians
embraced the roadmap to change and the beacon
of hope which President Sirleaf personified?
Did the cadre of intellectuals and technocrats
become visionless? Did the new administration
get duped? Did Recycled Politicians overwhelmed
the process and offered no new ideas to transform
the society?
Except
for the President and a handful of committed
and dedicated individuals, the majority of policymakers
and bureaucrats have not produced much in terms
of creativity and innovation over the past three
years. The author believes that is the reason
why ordinary Liberians have seen little in terms
of progress. What has most of those who have
lead ministries and public agencies done in
the past 3 years that have assisted in the Dynamics
of a Changing Society? Many seem very comfortable
riding around the countryside in SUVs with tinted
window and trying to make every effort to impress
the little people with their temporarily acquired
influence and power.
Over
the past three years, there have been revelations
of gross misuse of public funds at a time when
Liberia needs every dime for the monumental
reconstruction. The majority of our policymakers
seem all too ready to rely exclusively on the
ideas of President Sirleaf without offering
any of their own. The President is one person,
yes she is the visionary, but where are all
the progressives who for decades wanted to root
fundamental is social ideals?
No
public official, past or present, has the right
to squander public funds and get away with it.
Liberians must stand up, speak up and be counted
on the side of real change. For example, property
obtained by ill-gotten wealth must be confiscated;
officials who knowingly rob the national treasury
or the coffer of a public agency should not
be allowed to keep stolen loot and walk around
the society displaying illegal and ill-gotten
exploits. What sort of example would that set
for younger generation who make up over 46%
of the population? Could this be the reason
why ordinary Liberians call their public servants,
Recycled Politicians?
The
time has come for all to work together to raise
our expectations and transform our country into
world-class, high-performing communities, not
just for some, but for all our people. This
author believes that Change is illusive unless
and until it touches the lives of real people
making them socially upward mobile. The author
believes that by introducing multi-party elections
at the county, metropolitan, municipal and district
levels would ensure the election of competent
people to manage the urban, rural or local economy
are sought. This belief is premised on the assumption
that electorates become informed and would vote
for competent persons base upon their dedication
and commitment to uplifting, advancing and improving
livelihood, standard of livings, health and
basic services.
Because
good local governance and democratic decentralization
has not become widely broadcast or implemented
by the Sirleaf administration, our people are
not fully realizing their social aspirations.
According to UNDP, Sustained Poverty Reduction
requires equitable growthbut this author
would suggest that it also requires poor people
have political power that allows them to decide
their future given applicable resources and
political will. And the best way this author
believes that Liberia should achieve significant
social transformation that in a manner consistent
with human development objectives is by building
strong and deep forms of democratic governance
at all levels of society especially at the local
and rural levels.
Home